Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:03

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Obesity Newcomer Metsera, Up 23%, Enters The Ring With A Punch - Investor's Business Daily
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
NASA Might Have Accidentally Landed Near A Volcano On Mars - IFLScience
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
—— indirects on kuorans, irl and idols
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Quia qui rem laborum itaque vel.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
★ who are your favorite booktubers?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Google brings new Gemini features to Chromebooks, debuts first on-device AI - Ars Technica
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
June 27-July 3: New Moon to Crescent Sky Watch - The Weather Channel
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Mario Kart World 1.1.0 update out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything